A BVP nonexistence proof using Green’s Theorem
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
A BVP nonexistence proof using Green's Theorem
Dear Author, Please check your proof carefully and mark all corrections at the appropriate place in the proof (e.g., by using on-screen annotation in the PDF file) or compile them in a separate list. Note: if you opt to annotate the file with software other than Adobe Reader then please also highlight the appropriate place in the PDF file. To ensure fast publication of your paper please return ...
متن کاملAnother proof of Banaschewski's surjection theorem
We present a new proof of Banaschewski's theorem stating that the completion lift of a uniform surjection is a surjection. The new procedure allows to extend the fact (and, similarly, the related theorem on closed uniform sublocales of complete uniform frames) to quasi-uniformities ("not necessarily symmetric uniformities"). Further, we show how a (regular) Cauchy point on a closed uniform subl...
متن کاملA new proof for the Banach-Zarecki theorem: A light on integrability and continuity
To demonstrate more visibly the close relation between thecontinuity and integrability, a new proof for the Banach-Zareckitheorem is presented on the basis of the Radon-Nikodym theoremwhich emphasizes on measure-type properties of the Lebesgueintegral. The Banach-Zarecki theorem says that a real-valuedfunction $F$ is absolutely continuous on a finite closed intervalif and only if it is continuo...
متن کاملStability Proof of Gain-Scheduling Controller for Skid-to-Turn Missile Using Kharitonov Theorem
Gain scheduling is one of the most popular nonlinear control design approaches which has been widely and successfully applied in fields ranging from aerospace to process control. Despite the wide application of gain scheduling controllers, there is a notable lack of analysis on the stability of these controllers. The most common application of these kinds of controllers is in the field of fligh...
متن کاملProof of Theorem A
Since the full proof of this theorem 10] is simple yet quite tedious, we connne ourselves to the guidelines of the proof. Observing the angles between the three sample points s i ; s j ; s k forming the minimal angle and the corresponding VD vertex v, we take advantage of the fact that d(v; s i) < d(s i ; s k) (Theorem 4.2(ii)) and, by trigonometric arguments, show that sin sin(120) R M
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Applied Mathematics Letters
سال: 2017
ISSN: 0893-9659
DOI: 10.1016/j.aml.2017.01.009